Civilization Presented as Domestication
I get a lot of benefit from Robert Breedlove’s ‘What is money’ podcast. The guests are universally engaging, thoughtful and thought provoking, and the host is intelligent and adds a lot also.
This episode raised a point which seems obvious once heard: Humans are already domesticated, and are becoming more so.
This leads to what also seems a fundamental truth - Domestication leads inevitably to exploitation. We have been doing it to animals for a long time - almost as long as we have been doing it to ourselves.
The unwillingness to use violence to solve our differences, to protect ourselves, to determine resource allocations, underpins modern society, yet it domesticates us.
In more detail - there is a common biological counterbalance to violence, which are rewards for co-operation - eg. in the form of social bonds, status, desirability as a mate, nurtured offspring.
Even if we have enemies, it is still efficient to trust or have non-violent dispute resolution, otherwise we’d be less successful as a species. However, increasing trust can make it so there are zero consequences for breaking it. See the covid crimes for evidence. The trusting also have incentive to outsource their violence. To organised militaries, to slaughterhouses, to police and prisons. They are hence no longer in a position to defend themselves from exploitation via the only truly effective deterrent - force, or the threat of it. It’s why all of us pointing at Nuremberg codes and Laws and Constitutions were so easily dismissed - we did not have the organized violence on hand to make such things legitimate or relevant.
So. We have already been domesticated, but can we be even more domesticated?
Self Domestication
Yuval Noah Harari made an incredibly robust case in his 3 books that in seeking the most reasonable path, we will collectively make way for our own species divergence. For example, We virtually all voluntarily used electronics to replace memory and lost at least some of our memory skills, as we did for map reading/directions, making definitive long term plans. Concentration is plummeting, and critical thinking skills slipped away to an alarming extent before the Covid Crimes shone a light on their absence. Transhumanists are not, in general, claiming the evolution of humans will lead to superhumans. Instead, the 4th Industrial Revolution has independent, critically thinking, freedom loving humans as an enemy of convenience. With so many of us lining up for self-domestication, could this pesky remaining group of less docile citizens be neutralized relatively easily?
Active Domestication
It takes just ten years to turn a wild fox species into a very domestic one. What role then has the violence or peace of our ancestors shaped us? Did we kill all our most violent genes in the great wars? Did we breed out some of our individualism and independence in populating the earth with billions of people who largely cannot survive without massive interdependence?
Which leads to the question - are we being domesticated as an emergent property via the interplay of complex systems, or as an active plot with intention in at least some areas?
I do not know. I find the circumstantial evidence that ‘a few groups are intentionally shaping more docile masses’ to be compelling. Think of Flouride, microplastics, gender mutilation, endocrine disruptors everywhere, the vaccine schedule (what could be more domesticated than damaging your own kids as a ritual of servitude?). The lack of accountability for drugging so many people, the covering up of Lead, Mercury, Glyphosates and other poisonings which make a duller and often more docile population. The education system, lack of action on fraud and scientific skullduggery. The endless line of rhetoric from people and organisations laying the groundwork for an ideology of master and slave style divisions in humanity. Welfare. The forced introduction of a post truth era.
And the Covid injections. Anecdotal evidence is quite strong that people’s behaviour and thoughts change noticeably after a shot of the MRNA goo. The explanatory mechanism is there in both the listed side-effects, the hidden side-effects, and the small crowd sharing research on the jab’s negative effects on the brain.
The causes of changed behaviour are varied
It is reasonable to assume that not only does the vaccine cause cognitive decline, so does mask wearing, lockdowns and propaganda in general.
The mechanisms are not really controversial. MRNA instructing the body to create spike proteins causes prion damage. Inflammation causes more general damage harder to track specifically, but easier to assume will happen. Cortisol elevation, social isolation, 5th generation warfare’s mix of propaganda, disinformation, information overload, decision overload, chaos agents, controlled opposition, herding into limited hangouts and obfuscation of just about everything will each have their effects.
Add to this Flouride, environmental toxins, Electromagnetic Frequency (EMF’s) known effects on cognition and health, dopamine hits and emotional conditioning via AI, social media and that 5G warfare related culture war, and we know cognition is in decline, it only remains to be asked once again - is all this a by product of general greed and evil in pursuit of profits and general thoughtlessness, or is it, at least partly, a deliberate attempt to weaken the general population using a variety of methods?
Scorched Earth
Let’s continue to examine the possibility that this is not a gentleman’s war we are fighting.
When we become too domesticated - there is no one left to act as a counter-power to the military industrial complex, which will continue to become more callous to civilian violence until an opposing force emerges, or our domestication becomes so stark that we are no longer all human together. Operation Warp Speed results.
Now that our collective expectations have expanded regarding what depths of evil the world will instigate or tolerate, we cannot rule out our enemies using an operation like Warp Speed as a deliberate and intentional tactic of overwhelming their foes (us) with disabled and injured - what I will overgeneralize as a Scorched Earth tactic.
It matters not if we take Dr Martin’s, the CDC or the Pharma version of the injury rate - it all leads to millions of workers not able to work.
Fits a Pattern
Malicious intent fits a pattern. We can list literally thousands of historical cases of human error killing or injuring other humans. The atrocities of note, however are the ‘Spanish Flu’ vaccine injuries kicking off a long line of deliberate military operations. This site has a decent list to use as a reference:
We can thence state that some of the injuries and disabilities of the past were deliberately inflicted.
We can establish a clear motive
The accused in this article - Globalists, The Deep State, the Big Pharma, Tech, Censorship and Military Industrial Complexes, and so on, have repeatedly been observed profiting from the destruction of a thing. Destroying economies as outlined in Naomi Klein’s ‘The Shock Doctrine’. Destroying people and culture - see current examples of Palestine, Russia, or Syria. Destroying flesh and blood via constant war. And so on into the future. U.S. foreign policy openly admits to ‘Scorched Earth’ being an option for future policy.
We know also that the the World, led by the U.S treasury, is printing and borrowing far beyond any capacity to maintain, repay or otherwise correct - other than collapsing the system deliberately to push demand for the new one. Explained reasonably well here by this dude hoping to profit short term:
Expectation of injury
We also have a mechanism of injury which was entirely predictable, and was pushed through anyhow. It seems, to me at least, that such evidence cannot exist if the perpetrators wished to solely maximize profits. Strong indirect evidence that They Knew they were harming and injuring.
To summarise so far, I think a reasonable question is - are they harming people to actively domesticate them? Is there a plan to consume the resources of those who might resist (scorch the earth to rule the ashes), via deliberate injury?
And I think a reasonable answer is “yes” to both, and that we should arrange our understandings of what we observe accordingly.
Slave Soldiers
I’m sorry, but we cannot stop there. Given the abundance of anomolies found in vaccinated blood (thanks Robyn and David Hughes), and the decades of secrecy around trillions of dollars of military spending over many decades, we simply have to admit that a real possibility is that all of this is part of a military operation to create slave soldiers, or some sort of behavioral control arrangement inflicted on a population without consent. If the strategy is so successful for so many life forms, it remains an option as human destiny too.
Can you make people not Care?
People do not care like they used to, true. Tessa here argues the same sentiment, but goes on to add that they can no longer care, which I disagree with:
I think people can still care. When I look at my friends and family, whose eyes glaze over when I invite them to think or talk about the crimes being committed, or to show some care for my own self, yes there may be prion damage and psychological trauma, but I am strongly convinced that they are consciously making the choice to be callous.
This implies that they can still bring themselves to care in the future, no matter how many external forces there are shaping their current behaviours. It is support that the major factor here is something like Mass Formation, and not neural degeneration or something similar. The presence of such a strong and costly disinformation and propaganda campaign also suggests that any active behaviour modification programs or technologies are not fully effective. We’ll take that win, especially in such a doomy topic!
Conclusion with Pets and Pests Analogies
Domestication is not objectively good or bad. I have a cat which I care for, and I like to think there is a strong symbiosis (win-win) to her domestication. Hence, I’m not saying domestication is always bad, i’m saying using mechanisms of suffering to speed up domestication to suit the goals of psychopaths is bad, and is likely happening via groups of would-be domesticators.
My belief is also that at some point the world becomes zero-sum, that is, the only way I can thrive is if something else suffers. I take this view with pests - eg. mosquitos in my immediate vicinity. Hence I do not believe the Scorched Earth strategy is too evil to mention. I think it has always made sense when there is a power, technology or numbers disadvantage. Eg. for a few who are making a play at subjugating billions across the globe. It is especially effective when combined with terrorism, divide and conquer and other common tactics we have seen empires of the past use, and are currently see organisations such as the World Health Organisation (WHO) use.
I’m suggesting that this tactic has possibly been deliberately used against us in the form of injuries from injections, social isolation and mask tortures, or fearmongering, and that this weakens the resistance to it happening again, and weakens the push for accountability of it’s perpetrators.
This has been a conspiracy theory. I hope any readers get a head nod and a ‘that would make some sense’ feeling, while recognising that we will never definitively know the intentions of those who have been conspiring lately.
Intended outcome vs emergent phenomena? Just follow the money. For over a century, the tax-exempt foundations including Rockefeller, Carnegie and Ford have poured gobs of money into 'reforming' education to warp it into the factory schooling model; into promoting a warped version of feminism, which incited resentment between the sexes and drove many men to be ashamed of their own masculinity (and hence more easily domesticable); into research which essentially weaponised psychology as a means of gaining control over human beings; and into seeding the drug culture of the 1960s, which made a whole generation weak, lazy and self-obsessed (and also made them terrible parents whose children are even weaker, lazier and more self-obsessed).
Whether deliberate or not perhaps doesn't really matter. A bit like the nuke coming, ("sorry, I launched it by mistake.") :)
It appears to me that for western society, this generation has lost its capacity to suffer. i.e. "soft". Perhaps a silver lining is that it might backfire ?