Why it makes sense to become isolated and weird

As the progression of limited reveals, and pseudo-apologies about the Covid crimes march forth as planned, the freedom movement cheers. Few realize, however, that being consistently right, warning friends and family of direct and real threats, easing their fears over false threats, or remaining well informed will never be the actions or attributes which define us. We will forever be traitors, radicals, people who make trouble unnecessarily, whistleblowers. We will henceforth be defined as those who did not go along with it, who did not suffer the same passions as the herd while we were victims, nor are we those who will suffer the pain of awakening with the herd.

Even as the most ignorant cultists emancipate themselves in the face of overwhelming evidence, there will be very few apologies. Most will, in their heart of hearts, still resent the conspiracy revealers far more than the perpetrators. Sure, logically, we did not cause the pain, but we are a far easier thing to blame - and avoid, than lying psychopaths in positions of power within corrupt institutions.

I could be wrong with this prediction, however these rhetorical questions might sway you that is closer to probable than possible:

• How many people were literally poisoned under fraudulent premises by Pfizer, and still toddle off to the chemist for more, while avoiding their unvaxxed friend who shared the Pfizer adverse event list with them?

• How many people still ridicule those who highlight crimes rather than feel any anger toward the perpetrators?

• How many people still visit their doctor but not their conspiracy fact relative?

• How many people are forgiving of the systems and institutions that failed us, yet still remain critical of ‘Covid victim mentalities living in the past’?

• How many parents of vaccine injured children are celebrated for their efforts to warn others?

• How many people have irrefutable evidence they were indoctrinated by Facebook, Twitter, newspapers and Google, and still use all those as their main forms of communication, while never seeking ‘news’ from perpetually accurate, ethical and predictive independent sources?

• How many people respect Edward Snowden for revealing his governments crimes? How many people or organizations suffered repercussions apart from Edward Snowden himself?

• How many historical figures who opposed the U.S. military Industrial Complex are celebrated as being prescient?

• How many people know the Awfulness behind the Royal family, but would shush those who mention it and clap the ‘royals’ as they saunter past?

• How many people still pretend the treasonous politicians who presided over the lockdowns deserve a modicum of respect, or are entitled to still run for or hold public office?

• How many people will scorn a thief up to a certain dollar amount, at which point they apply to work for them, or re-elect them to do it again?

Let us, then, allow me to progress with the premise that there will forever be a divide between people who care about the covid crimes and people who do not. It will forever be easier to attack the weak party with truth on their side, than the strong party with only strength on their side.

Yet surely we can still all get along?

Yes, but you will not be able to talk about anything real. You will not be able to claim, honesty, compassion, empathy, discernment, critical thinking and respectful communication as traits of these acquaintances. You will not have many shared fundamental aspects of reality - Economics, Politics, Basic Human Decency, Law, Humanity, Science, Medicine, Social Contracts, Communication Norms, Freedom, Censorship, Truth, all have markedly different starting points depending on whether Covid was a Scam or a Pandemic. You will also have to do better than I can at dealing with the elephant in the room, silently screaming “We were all attempting to silence and ridicule you, rather than grant you the assumption of equality while you were being persecuted for challenging lies.”

If you find that especially distasteful, as I do, then that is where we reach the conclusion that there is a lot to gain by becoming isolated and weird. From one view, you give up interacting with large portions of society. From another, you become independent of groups or individuals who would dehumanize you, or worse (were it not for whatever confluence of fates prevented this latest human atrocity from being a more dramatic genocide). As Richard Kelly notes, being ordinary has been criminalized anyway. Might as well continue to do it as a dissident.