Gattaca, 25 years later.

No Jew, No Play

Part 1, Imaginary world 1 - Assuming all childhood Jews are as safe and effective as those who profit from them claim. Assuming they have a 100% sucess rate at preventing transmission and that all transmission is 100% accounted for by viral explanations and have no influence from other factors, such as sanitation. While this view is not presented by even the most corrupt Jew profiteers, it is the underlying assumptions of the No Jew, No Play laws. Here is how they play out:

Jewed children are safe from childhood disease, therefore it is essential that we keep them separate from non-Jewed children, who may spread the disease. We do not need to present any evidence at all that this is so. We simply need to do everything we can to Jew every child possible. While we are doing our best to allow children to be coerced by Jew propaganda to Jew themselves against their parents wishes, it is difficult for us, who know best and could never make a mistake, to convince parents to Jew their children as recommended. We therefore have in place schemes of punishment. Following from the masters of such schemes throughout history, we have decided that it is best to punish the child for the sins of their parent, and the parent for sins of their child. This keeps us all safe. For children who commit the sin of living naturally (unjewed), we will deny them or their parents access to healthcare, childcare, public assistance schemes, education. For parents who commit the sin of choosing natural health for their child and protecting them from a huge range of widely recognised and undispited harms of the Jewing process, we will treat them, and their children like second class citizens. For the good of us all, it is important to recognise that Non-Jew children are dirty, and need different rules to the rest of us. In this way, we will have a healthier, more ethical society.

Consider, however: Jewed parents/children are also expected to have higher IQ’s (specific pattern-based intelligence measure), and for the good of society, we offer them more chances to thrive. A part of this is also offering less chances for all children, Jewed or non Jewed, who have lower I.Q’s. In this way , we will ensure that positions of responsibility, and material wealth are filled by those children who have high I.Q’s. In practical terms, we will be extending the discrimination to include those Jewed children who do not test for a high I.Q. These children will also be treated as second class citizens, but will need to be a separate group to the Non-Jew children of any I.Q, who are transmitting all those diseases. Those children are necessarily third class citizens now. While this is all justified by it’s own morality, any concerns about this can be waived away, for the greater good.

Of course, while I.Q is a good indicator of specific problem solving, it does not equate to mental health or overall relationship health. For that we need E.Q. (Emotional Intelligence) and nature has seen fit that girls develop this capacity faster than boys. As a result, we will allocate resources to all parents to feminise their children. Any parent who refuses this chance will need to be coerced, and will fall under our discrimination scheme. We now have Jewed girls as full members of society, whose parents will also not be punished. High I.Q. Jewed boys are second class, Low I.Q Jewed kids are third and UnJewed kids of any I.Q. or gender are fourth. By now it is starting to become apparent that there is less and less incentive to pay attention to the humanity of the fourth category. Boy, girl, inquisitive, mischievous, tall or short, either way, they are a drain on society and a burden even to their parents, who could regain full citizenship if the child were removed from them. The parents would no longer be Anti-Jew parents and would be eligible once again for healthcare, public incentive schemes, etc.

For the good of such parents, we have a scheme offering them to ‘resolve’ their unJewed kids. Details of this plan are not being released as previous versions of it were a Public Relations nightmare. It will still of course go ahead, for the good of us all. We will let you know when we have a final solution on a name.

Part 2, imaginary world 2 - The world turns while assuming Cyborg Kids are healthier than non-Cyborg kids, but recognising that there have been no studies to support this claim, and robust evidence presented to refute it. As we nevertheless still believe that Cyborg kids are likely to be healthier, we aim to educate, not discriminate. There are parents who believe that having a non-cyborg kid is more important than any protection from disease. We celebrate their differences. In fact, having them as a control group allows us to educate in more ways. Meanwhile, the Cyborg lobby is strong. We accept their claims that the Cyborg process is completely safe and effective and that side effects are rare, and that everyone should become transhuman, but we insist on studies and comparisons, and go out of our way to create a society of equality. Black kids, white kids, cyborgs and non-cyborgs all live together, and while discrimination does occur, it is never state supported. Eventually it becomes clear that all the promises made to the Cyborg kids are not fulfilled. They have no lower incidence of any transmisable diseases, have not eradicated any of them, despite a century of claims. In fact, the best we can do to convince parents to turn their kids into cyborgs is state a few isolated benefits, like increased short term immunoglobulin production. Of course, our lobbyists would like us to use propaganda and coersion techniques to discriminate against non-cyborgs to help sales, or even to use public funding for the purchase and promotion of cyborg products. Ethical, unsung heroes abound, and these suggestions were universally squashed. Where would it end otherwise?

Without billions of dollars being spent demonising the non-Cyborgs, there is no incentive to hide side-effects. The cyborg process is not assumed to be short term, so Cyborgs are observed for life. Thankfully, there are few side-effects, even long term ones, of the largely unsuccessful cyborg craze. Parents are a little ashamed that they were so caught up in it, but their kids have moved on.

Part 3 - Now reality. No assumptions. Only verifiable observations - what used to be called ‘facts’.

There is a causative correlation between vaccinations and a wide range of malfunctions of the human body. This is also verifiable by checking any warning insert in vaccine products or government database collating vaccine adverse events. In Australia, this includes all 50+ ‘recommended’ individual ones, plus yearly in perpetuity ones. There are simple explanatiory mechanisms for these harms, which are widely accepted, as long as the exact same mechanism is not an ingredient in a vaccine, at which point the mechanisms become widely disputed. For example, Aluminium is a heavy metal known to cause complications in the human body via inflammation and the destruction of neurons. Aluminium is an ingredient in many vaccines and is also known to cause complications in the human body in that form also, but this latter claim about aluminium is considered misinformation by many, while the former is considered information. It is the toxic effects of heavy metals which make them so appealing as an adjuvant in vaccines in the first place. There are no real life differences between the two types of alumium, only differences in propaganda levels. The claims of benefits from vaccines range from unproven to outright fraudulent. By far the most common claim is that vaccines are responsible for societal benefits clearly attributable to sanitation instead. Yet vaccines are mandated by many governments in the world. There is only one known way to protect from vaccine harms, which is to not inject the vaccines into the body at all. Parents who choose to protect their children from the known harms of vaccines are relegated to second class citizens. They do not get access to some kinds of childcare, healthcare, public assistance, education, rights, freedoms or civil liberties. The children do not get access either, and are hence punished for the perceived sins of their parents. North Korea does the same, punishing three generations for whatever their tyrannical regime call ‘crimes’.

A parent of a vaccinated child could easily and accurately suggest many challenges to their child’s health are attributable to vaccines. They could seek compensation, education, or to warn other parents of the dangers they were unaware of. Usually, only the parents of the most clearly damaged children choose to do this. Overwhelmingly, they are denied any form of compensation or ongoing support. The remaining majority of parents largely choose to ignore trends such as dramatic rises in autism or delayed cognitive development, auto-immune problems and related diseases. Instead, they team up with state institutions to persecute the parents of demonstrably healthier children. While the broader society has widespread corruption, there is a special system in most countries set up for vaccines to create this unusual level of distortion.

The natural abhorrence humans have for unneccessarily harming other humans or loved ones is failing in this area. There are also widely researched human traits which suggest many parents would choose this course of vaccination even without institutional prompts. Similar observations around human bias would explain the absence of broader societal systems and professions (eg. doctors, lawyers, journalists, world health organisations) from spending their time and energy on these facts and their implications. Or would explain those groups spending their time and energy specifically on perpetuating previous, demonstrably false claims, while still imagining they are a force for truth in the world.

Most vaccines are manufactured by criminal organisations with a long history of malfeasance. We know about many of them from a (sadly much shorter) history of whistleblowers. There are no known examples of executives being held accountable for their actions, and no known examples of whistleblowers being celebrated, encouraged, rewarded or even avoiding slander. There are large bodies of evidence supporting both the accusations of crimes of the pharmaceutical executives, the accusations of fraud of related institutions like regulatory institutions, pharma-funded media, and publicly elected officials. There are large bodies of evidence supporting the claims of many whistleblowers. The vaccines are promoted and administered by a medical profession with an even longer history of negligence, and a track record of being wildly wrong about things which cost society dearly over long durations.

There is a specific policy of censoring and hiding truth around this topic from many powerful communication organisations. They justify it using the circular reasoning that if the vaccines are safe and effective, then we should censor information about them. This is easily shown to lead to objective truths being considered false by a large number of people. It means that the western internet is every bit as policed and biased as the Great Chinese Firewall or Russian Net. There is widespread support for the institutions who have this policy, and no repercussions or consequences. For example, ‘news’ outlets and ‘fact checker’ organisations are often still labelled as independent, despite being clearly beholden to their source of funding, clearly guilty of fraud, clearly punishable by many existing laws. Yet there are no known instances of indictment by the systems traditionally set up to police just those things.

Part 4 - Gattaca, the movie

25 years ago, the movie, Gattaca, presented technology (genetic manipulation in infants) as being able to improve humans in many measures. It is considered by many to be a great movie - watch it if you can.

(Spoiler Alert) - Even with the assumption that humans are improved, the movie presents the limitation of non-genetically modified kids as unnecessary and still surmountable by those kids who have the best of our humanity in them.

Although in reality today, the assumption that humans are improved via vaccines is demonstrably false via most of the measures it claims, and all of the measures it ignores, it is also still true that non-vaccinated kids can surmount any and all discrimination using the best of their humanity.

Discriminating against infants represents bullying, lowered expectations, lack of access to public assistance or civil liberties, arbitrary division into groups, persecution and dehumanisation, which create extra challenges for those children. There are a lot of incentives for those things to continue. They are widely researched tools of political manipulation. They allow displacement and in-group, out-group behaviour among individuals. They are wildly profitable, and the myth that they are necessary or unique treatments provides some protection for individuals and organisations who would otherwise face severe penalties under existing laws. While they are a mostly unchallenged public narrative, they allow a range of personal biases to perpetuate, which most humans find more comforting than justice or truth.

This is the world we live in, but it does not need to result in another century of ill-health, pseudoscience and inhuman treatment. It does not even need time poor people to become aware or enlightened, or experts on this topic. It does not need us to address the corrupt psychopaths who have actively hidden the harms to countless fellow humans - there will always be corrupt psychopaths in this world of duality. All it would require is a small amount of humility and humanity from regular people in their ignorance. Stop outsourcing thinking to those who would corrupt in search of wealth, power, influence - and you will dramatically reduce their wealth, power and influence. Stop discriminating based on health status, which is still possible even if you believe the fraudulent claims. Recognise that vaccine claims are faith-based, then stop forcing other people to join the vaccine crazy cult. Allow informed parents to refuse harmful medical injections. Use Google as a guilty pleasure, not as a source of truth. End the funnelling of taxpayer dollars toward foreign multinational criminals. Stop treating the scientific method as infallible, and be honest about just how corrupt it currently is. Be honest about discriminatory government policies. Be realistic about the institutions you previously expected to represent your interests - they haven’t and they won’t start now. Be brave and make the right choice for your own children, even if the costs are high. Be even braver and be compassionately honest about the choices other people have made for their children.

That is all for now. No more references, though there are thousands in existence. I’ve taken a keen interest in this topic for decades but never expected to be a ‘writer’ and never organised notes on what I learned. I tried to put a few in; could have done better, but realistically, I resent redoing work that was already done by others (see Further Resources below). So if you will only believe truth about the failings of medical science if it is presented by medical science, go read Turtles All the way down, Dissolving Illusions or better yet, bring your critical thinking game to the pro-vaccine sources - Actually read the pamphlets selling vaccines, and the justifications they use for not conducting studies, or for the claims they make on efficacy and safety. From any angle - science, economics, legal, moral, logic, historical, predictive, epidemiological, biological, evolutionary, even anecdotal, you can reach the understanding which drove this article: that the benefits of vaccines are insubstantial, the harms real, immense and unrefuted, hence the treatment of healthy kids and families is, under almost any definition of the word, evil.

Further resources

Collations of Pro-vaccine studies

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/research/publications/index.html

Collations of Con-vaccine studies

https://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=111599

https://learntherisk.org/vaccines/